13 January 2025




It seems we are Schrodinger’s Church - both growing and shrinking at the same time - according to the latest statistical release from the Church of England. Attendance in 2023 was higher than 2022, but still significantly below pre-pandemic levels so we have yet to show we have bucked the overall long-term trend of decline.

The headlines from Statistics for Mission 2023 are that the post-COVID bounce-back continued with an increase in attendance of between 2.5% and 5%, depending on which measure you use. But the bad news is that those numbers still put us well below the pre-pandemic attendance level.

The key numbers are average all-age attendance during October, which increasing by 4.6% between 2022 and 2023, but that level is still 20% lower than 2019. That pattern is broadly consistent across most measures.

Easter and Christmas attendances increased by more in 2023 (8.6% and 20% respectively) but Mouse observes that these tend to fluctuate more depending on the weather and the day of the week that these festivals fall, and overall they are still well down on pre-pandemic levels by 20% and 16% respectively.

Mouse would like to offer a few observations.

It is commendable that the Church of England publishes such fulsome statistics and the methodology used is probably the most reliable of all the options. It has been consistent for many years to allow comparisons to be drawn and trends identified. The church asks each parish to physically count the number of people who come through the doors for each service during October and then adds them all up. This has the advantage that it is, in theory at least, not a subjective measure. It does not rely on estimations or surveys which could be subject to bias depending on who does or does not fill them out. To that extent, we treat the numbers as reliable.

However, that does not mean that we should not do further interpretative work on the outcomes.

It has been obvious for some time that one of the issues with this methodology is that counting the number of people in attendance does not give a clear indication of the size of the membership of a church. The count would be the same for a Church with 50 members who were all in attendance each week as a church with 100 members but where attendance is 50%. Electoral rolls are even less reliable as they are only fully refreshed every four years and even then depend on the extent to which church administrators are motivated to enrol parishioners.

This feature of the data means that it is difficult to interpret changes. Do falls represent the same number of church members attending less frequently or fewer members attending at the same rate as previously. Or both. Conversely, do we interpret the recent rise in attendance as the conversion of new members attending church for the very first time, or simply those who had stayed at home for a while coming back, or just those already attending coming to church more frequently.

For this reason, the Church of England stats wizards came up with a new measure - the ‘worshipping community’. This attempts to measure those who attend worship once per month or more, whether physically or online, so is intended to give a more rounded picture of membership. This number shows a 2.5% increase from 2022 to 2023, but only a 10% reduction from the 2019 level.

This is perhaps a little more encouraging, but given the more survey-based nature of this number, it is subject to more bias. Mouse likes the concept, but it lacks the rigour to be able to rely on it too heavily. And even if we take it at face value, it still points to a shrinking church, just one which is shrinking more slowly than the headline figures.

It is also important to note that these numbers are already pretty dated by the time they are published. The latest release relates to October 2023 attendance. To that extent they are what statisticians would call a lagging indicator, helpful mostly to understand the past rather than predict the future. However, within these numbers some of the statistics could be considered leading indicators - ones which point to a future direction. 

Marriages and baptisms are not true leading indicators, but have shown that they move more quickly than the headline attendance numbers, so may be a proxy for leading indicators.

Sadly the data here is not encouraging. As Mouse has previously noted, marriage rates within the Church of England have been plunging and, if you exclude some blips around the pandemic and avoid over-interpreting the post-Covid bounce-back, remain dreadfully low. Similarly, baptism rates are plunging, with the latest data showing the CofE undertaking 24% fewer baptisms than as recent as 2019.

The thing that determines whether a church will grow or shrink is the number - the rate at which church members replicate themselves. Or more simply whether more people are joining the church through birth and conversion, or whether more a leaving it by death or by leaving the faith.

The Church of England has had a negative r rate for quite some time. This is in large part due to demographic change. According to the ONS, there were 598,000 deaths in England and Wales in 2023 and 598,400 births. However, there was population grown of 610,000 due to net immigration of 622,000. The balancing figure is migration from England and Wales to Scotland. Population growth was strongest in cities and urban areas, also reflected in the CofE data.

Recent immigrant communities are far less likely to join the Church of England than those born in England. At the time of the last census, the largest immigrant communities in the UK were from India, Poland, Pakistan, Romania, Ireland, Nigeria, Italy, Germany and Bangladesh. None have a significant Anglican church, from which migrants might expect to naturally move into the Church of England on arrival, with the exception of Ireland, which has around 125,000 members in the Republic - small enough not to invalidate the broad line of argument here.

Without any conversions or people losing the faith, the church will naturally shrink unless church members have babies at the same rate as the death rate and every single baby born to parents who attend the church will subsequently grow up in the faith. Neither of these propositions are realistic.

Evidence from recent studies in church growth within the Church of England show that this fundamental in the r rate has not been overcome, even by the most successful evangelical church planting initiatives. While the evidence base on church planting in the Anglican context is very limited, what does exist seems to show that the vast majority of attendees in new church initiatives are those who either come from another church or who have some degree of churchgoing in their past. In other words, these initiatives are reaching people from within a population which is itself shrinking. The best this can do, therefore, is slow the decline.

According to a 2021 report from the Strategic Development Unit, the data on Resource Churches who had been given funding to support church growth in the Church of England showed that 38% of attendees moved from other churches and 24% had recently moved to the area. A further 14% were ‘de-churched’ (i.e. used to go to church but gave it up) and just 9% had never been to church. The remaining 15% were either part of the plant team, the ‘inherited’ church community or attend in addition to another church.

Even this data is potentially subject to challenge as it was collected by survey from the churches themselves, who may have an inherent optimism bias about the success of their evangelism efforts. Mouse also notes that all the Resource churches identified were in cities, where population growth was strongest and were the result of huge efforts by the planting churches and massive financial investment.

We have yet to find a model which can reach significant numbers of people who have never been to church or come from non-Christian communities, which is essential to increase the r rate of the Church.

So what have we learned from the most recent statistical release? Mouse would encourage a combination of optimism and realism. It is positive that the church appears to have been growing. We must be realistic that the Church of England may not be the church of choice for everyone and we are not part of a growing community. We must continue with church growth efforts that are working, even if they are merely slowing the decline. We must re-double efforts to revitalise those church communities which have been neglected by the most recent Renewal and Reform plans.

The Save The Parish initiative has given voice to some of those who feel neglected by Renewal and Reform programme. The argument goes that the bulk of the Church of England’s parishes have been neglected and starved of resources while millions is ploughed into shiny new initiatives, which are yielding meagre results. 

Mouse has to admit that the maths is difficult to comprehend. With 16,000 churches at its disposal, growing the church by just one weekly attender at each church would be an increase of 2% - a remarkable and dramatic turn-around in the long term decline of the Church. That isn’t to say that shiny new things should be stopped - there are many great examples of revitalised churches growing strongly. But Mouse contends that these efforts have not overcome the demographics, so a new plan to support the whole of the church is needed.

The last dose of realism Mouse would add is that the trend of decline is a very long one. It has hardly budged regardless of who has been Archbishop, what national evangelism strategies we have employed, which issues are causing the most argument in the Church at the moment. This points to something more fundamental in our society and demographics which will take enormous efforts to overcome. It has happened in the past, but changes to trends this deep do not happen very often.



6 January 2025



Thank you for subscribing to updates via email. Mouse has migrated to a new system to distribute updates, so if you subscribed on the old 'FollowIt' system you might notice that things look slightly different now. You still have the option to opt out at any time (booo!) and Mouse crosses his heart and promises not to use your email address for anything whatsoever other than sending you updates via email.




Thanks again!

Mouse

A minor revolution may be taking place in the history of the Anglican Communion. Firstly a little historical context is helpful to understand what is being proposed.

The Anglican Communion came into fruition rather organically in the 18th and 19th centuries. In 1787 Charles Inglis, Bishop of Nova Scotia was appointed with Jurisdiction over all of British North America. He was the first of what would become a series of 'Colonial Bishops' appointed by the King within the Church of England. Inglis had sailed to the US on behalf of the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts, which still exists today in the for of USPG.

Other Colonial Bishops were appointed and a slow process of development through the 19th century led to increasing independence of national Churches under 'Metropolitan Bishops'. In 1841 the Colonial Bishoprics Council was established, which formalised more Dioceses and Metropolitan Bishops and in 1867 the first Lambeth Conference took place at the invitation of Archbishop Longley.

This marked the start of a more fomalised structure, whereby Provinces established effective autonomy from England, which became endorsed under the structures established and agreed globally. It is those structures that we have inherited today.

The strange thing about the Anglican Communion, however, is that in ceding virtually all central authority to its Provinces there remains very little in the institution or structures that join the member provinces together. They are instead bound together by history and by a willingness to call themselves members of a Communion and to meet and work together.

Recently, it is the second of these that has come under significant strain. Member provinces have disagreed on issues of sexuality with such ferocity that some have rejected communion fellowship with other members. Conservative provinces have boycotted attendance at the Lambeth Conference where bishops who have endorsed same-sex marriage and 'liberal' position on sexuality are invited. They have also recognised the break-away Anglican Church of North America and established various forms of collaboration outside the traditional structures of the Anglican Communion. Following the Church of England's more modest proposals under Living in Love and Faith, some have rejected the authority of the Archbishop of Canterbury entirely.

Despite this, the actual authority if the Archbishop of Canterbury is very limited. Justin Welby has repeatedly used the phrase 'I'm not a pope' to try to be clear that he is not in a position of direct authority over any of the global provinces of the Anglican Communion except his own.

He holds a traditional position of authority within the communion as a focus for unity, with power only to invite bishops to the Lambeth Conference and to act as President of the Anglican Consultative Council, a body which itself has very limited powers to work collaboratively and advise members church on global affairs.

Nevertheless, if even the Lambeth Conference cannot meet in full and the ACC cannot function effectively due to boycotts, then change must come.

With that context, the Anglican Consultative Council asked the Inter-Anglican Standing Commission on Unity, Faith and Order (IASCUFO), one of its permanent committees, to look at reform. The IASCUFO is made up of 18 members, around two thirds of whom are from the Global South. At the last ACC meeting, the IASCUFO put a report forward proposing further work be done and in response the ACC:

1. Welcomes the proposal from the Inter-Anglican Commission on Unity, Faith and Order (IASCUFO) to explore theological questions regarding structure and decision-making to help address our differences in the Anglican Communion;
2. Affirms the importance of seeking to walk together to the highest degree possible, and learning from our ecumenical conversations how to accommodate differentiation patiently and respectfully;
3. Asks the IASCUFO for any proposals that may impact the ACC constitution to be brought for full discussion to the ACC-19 [its next meeting in 2026]; and
4. Asks IASCUFO to proceed with this work and report its progress to the Instruments of Communion

Mouse observes that there are some limits to this brief, in that it comes from the ACC and cannot impact on wider issues beyond the remit of the ACC. As such, some topics such as the role of the Lambeth Conference and the Primates Meetings, two key instruments of communion, are out of scope.

It is also explicit that the remit and purpose of this work is to find ways of resolving our current differences. While some of the commentary talks about post-colonial power structures, the brief was simply to find ways to manage our current differences, so that talk appears to Mouse to be somewhat beside the point.

Bishops at the Lambeth Conference

On 18 December, the IASCUFO published a lenghty report, under the stewardship of our very own Graham Tomlin. It proposes two changes which the report itself accepts are models, but with the hope for more significant impact.

1. To change the description of the Anglican Communion from one which describes provinces as being 'in communion' with Canterbury to merely having a 'historical connection' with Canterbury. 
2. To remove the Archbishop of Canterbury from being permanent president of the ACC and introduce a rotating Chair.

The hope is that it will enable the Communion to move on from a period of intense division to one in which members can genuinely 'walk together' while accepting that differences exist. The report is honest about the depth of division, suggesting it may even be an existential threat to the Communion.

The proposals recognises both that member provinces are genuinely autonomous in their decision-making but also want to remain in some way part of a global communion and in downgrading the role of Archbishop of Canterbury also accepts that England is no longer the center of the Anglican world.

If successful, it would mark an extraordinary and unexpected success in Justin Welby's attempts at reconciliation within the Anglican Communion, finally taking practical steps in implementing the declared intention of 'walking together' in some form.

Mouse has a few questions, however.

The obvious question is whether these minor technical changes will be sufficient to placate militarised conservatives who have previously insisted that 'Godly discipline' be exercised over churches which have introduced policies on human sexuality with which they disagree. Mouse is sceptical on that front.

The description of the Anglican Communion to be amended originates only from the 1930 Lambeth Conference. the IASCUFO paper argues that it is de facto the primary definition as it is the one which is most commonly referred to, but it is not something which sits in a formal constitution or legally binding document, so this move is symbolic at best. It may be something which allows those in a form of impaired communion to stay within the Anglican Communion in good conscience, but it doesn't change much in practice.

Secondly, it reduces the concept of Anglicanism to little more than an acceptance of the name. If provinces are no longer willing to say they are actually in communion with each other, then in what way are they actually part of a communion? Mouse could understand a proposal which changed the perspective from being in communion with Canterbury to being in Communion with one another, but simply one which has a historical connection to Canterbury is watered down to homeopathic levels.

Rowan Williams' solution to this connundrum was to attempt to introduce a 'Covenant'. The 1988 Lambeth Conference called for a "common declaration" that would assist a coherent doctrinal identity for the Communion, but no such declaration was produced. In 2004 the Windsor report called for a declaration from provinces to 'bind themselves' to each other by a covenant and a paper was produced by the ACC in 2006 titled Towards an Anglican Covenant discussing a way forward. Rowan Williams ran with the idea as Archbishop, largely in response to the troubles the Communion was finding itself in. But his efforts failed to convince. The final nail in the coffin was a rejection by a majority of the dioceses in the Church of England in 2012, which meant the proposal could not be taken forward in the Church of England. It came shortly before the end of Williams’s retirement and the concept was not taken forward by his successor.

Mouse's final observation is that the process for appointing a new Archbishop of Canterbury is underway and under reforms brought about by the Church of England, this includes greater representation from the Anglican Communion in recognition of Canterbury's global role. In July 2022 the rules were changed to include five representatives from the Anglican Communion on the 17 member committee who decides on the new Archbishop and representation from the Diocese of Canterbury was cut from six to three. It is rather unfortunate timing that these are being put into action at the same time as the proposals to significantly downgrade the Archbishop's global role. Had these proposals come sooner it is unlikely the Church of England would have changed the rules on appointing the new Archbishop.


2 January 2025


It has been great to be back blogging after a long break and Mouse has been delighted by the response it has received. He has enjoyed digging up some interesting research and generating AI images to illustrate it.



By way of a kick off to the new year, here are the top five most read blog posts of 2024 from The Church Mouse blog.

1. What is the Church of England's doctrine?
Mouse takes a look at what the Church of England actually means by 'doctrine' and what it might contain, tracing its origins back to the 39 Articles and its development since then.

Mouse take a long view of Justin Welby's time as Archbishop of Canterbury and attempts an honest assessment of his time in office.

In light of repeat failures of the CNC to appoint new bishops when needed, Mouse took a look at the process in its historical context and considers whether it is time for an update. The post concluded by saying that it needed to be sorted out in time for Justin's retirement, although it has turned out to be a rather more pressing issue.

Following an interesting question on social media, Mouse took a look at the (very long) history of clerical dress and considers the theological and missiological implications.

Mouse took a look at the data on Church marriages, which sadly is not pretty reading, and considers the implications of no longer marrying very many people.


18 December 2024


In 44BC Rome was reeling from the assassination of Julius Caesar. He had re-shaped the politics of Rome and made himself an emperor in all but name, but enemies had conspired and he was murdered on the Ides of March. 

Caesar was popular with the people and fear of reprisals from the mob meant that the aftermath was tense and carefully managed. Mark Antony brokered a deal with the conspirators in the Senate to avoid punishment for them, but Julius Caesar would be honored and his appointments and structures maintained. Within two years of his murder, Caesar was recognised by the Senate as a god.

After a legendary power struggle, Caesar's great-nephew and adopted son Octavian emerged as the sole ruler of Rome in 27BC and adopted the name Augustus, ruling as Emperor. His keen propaganda skills made extensive use of his relationship with Caesar, promoting the cult of Caesar as a way of boosting his own status. Ever since Caesar's elevation to divine status in 42BC, Augustus had styled himself Divi Fillius - Son of the God. He would later claim that he was conceived by his mother Atian when she was asleep in the Temple of Apollo and was visited by the god in the form of a snake, so some considered Augustus the son of a god twice over.

One of the most famous events in the aftermath of Julius Caesar's death took place a few weeks later. A bright star appeared in the sky, visible throughout the day and night. Scientists today speculate that this may have been one of the brightest comets in recorded history. The appearance of this 'star' was immediately interpreted as Caesar's spirit being taken to the divine realm in the process of his deification. It was the most famous comet in antiquity, known throughout the Roman world. The poet Ovid wrote in AD8

Then Jupiter, the Father, spoke..."Take up Caesar's spirit from his murdered corpse, and change it into a star, so that the deified Julius may always look down from his high temple on our Capitol and forum." He had barely finished, when gentle Venus stood in the midst of the Senate, seen by no one, and took up the newly freed spirit of her Caesar from his body, and preventing it from vanishing into the air, carried it towards the glorious stars. As she carried it, she felt it glow and take fire, and loosed it from her breast: it climbed higher than the moon, and drawing behind it a fiery tail, shone as a star.

Matthew wrote his Gospel around a hundred years later. By then, the cult of Caesar was well established alongside the cult of Augustus, who ruled until AD14. The association of Caesar with the star as a sign of his divinity was also well known. Coins from the period regularly feature the star motif and Augustus reigned as the son of a god at the time of Christ's birth.


It is with this backdrop that Matthew tells us that magi from the East, saw a bright star in the sky, signifying the birth of a king and they followed it to find the baby Jesus in Bethlehem. Matthew's account is tailor made to invert the story of Augustus, Divi Filius, to tell the story of Jesus Christ, Son of God.

As we read that story again this year, it strikes Mouse that there remain many reports of stars heralding the gods of our day. Political stars tell us that prosperity and security can be bought at the price of our loyalty to the latest demagogue. Stars seen by 'influencers' tell us that health, happiness and well-being can be found with the purchase of the latest product, with just a small commission payment taken along the way to enrich those helping us find our path. Other stars point to a culture that seeks happiness and fulfillment in the selfish pursuit of our own desires, without the need to put others in our community before ourselves. There are many stars and their prophets seem to be greater in number than we have known for some time.

The tricky thing is not spotting bright stars, but working out which one to follow. The Romans did indeed spot a bright star in the sky, just as the magi did. But their belief that it signaled the divinity of Caesar was in error, while the magi correctly interpreted the star they saw and followed it to Jesus.

One of the keys is to avoid stars that point us to the self gratification, enrichment or status of those who spotted them. Following Jesus is a path of humility and self sacrifice, but Augustus urged others to follow the cult of Caesar for his own benefit, not for anyone else's. By contrast, the magi did not know where the star was leading them and sought no benefit in following it other than the privilege of paying homage to a new king.

As the Church of England struggles with a crisis caused by repeated and appalling failures to act on safe-guarding issues out of a sense of fear for its own position, we must more than ever follow the star that points to Jesus, wherever that leads us. And do so with the expectation of humble and sacrificial service to others.

Our story today can also invert the stories of those who look to take advantage of others for their own gain, just as Augustus did by encouraging worship of his Great Uncle, to boost his own prestige. In our case, if following the star to Jesus means accepting our personal and institutional failures, then it must be done whatever the seeming cost. Then we serve our communities with humility and grace, preaching the good news of a God who came as a baby to show us what a life of love can look like. 

Our church is shrinking and that is desperately worrying, but a church which lets the vulnerable suffer and covers it up through fear that a reputation could be hurt by the truth is no church of Christ and not one worth preserving. Perhaps if we follow the star to Jesus, we should be more confident that whatever hardship we face on the road it will eventually lead us to where we need to be.

6 December 2024


The debate on assisted dying has exposed a gaping hole in our collective understanding of Christian ethics, as secular atheists demand religious arguments be labelled as such.

A frequent debate in British politics is the discussion around the extent to which faith leaders should speak up on political matters. The typical pattern is for a Christian leader to criticise something the government of the day has done on the grounds of their Christian ethics, following which they are told to get their beak out of politics by the party who has been scolded, but are applauded as an important voice of morality by the party who agrees with them.

This pattern has become so familiar that it is greeted with eye rolling by those within the Church, who respond with the pat arguments that if you don't think Jesus had anything to say about the poor and needy you can't be very familiar with his work. And Mouse suspects that the view of the general public is that we would generally expect religious leaders to speak up on eithical issues.

But there are some issues which buck this trend. 

In the UK, the abortion debate lacks the intensity that it has in the US, but is still one in which the Christian voice, and particularly that of the Catholic Church, is prominent. However, their views are often labelled as 'religious objections'. The view that life begins at conception is considered a matter of faith, rather than an objective truth, so all that follows from that belief is a subjective morality, relevant only if you hold to that foundational article of faith. 

This has the effect of putting those 'religious views' into a box, relevant only to religious adherents. The response from secular society is then that if you believe abortion to be wrong 'on religious grounds', then we'll respect that, but you shouldn't expect us non-believers to abide by your religious rules. The strategy of Respect and Ignore.

The debate on assisted dying came unexpectedly quickly. Mouse commented before that Church leaders appeared unprepared. The new government had long indicated it would allow a free vote on the issue, but when Kim Leadbeater secured a coveted place at the top of the ballot for private members bills in the House of Commons she pushed that vote much earlier in the Parliamentary timetable than many had expected.

It was widely observed that the debate in the Commons and the wider public debate was conducted with respect and dignity all round. It was broadly accepted that both proponents and opponents of the measure were both attempting to work through a very difficult issue, minimise suffering, balance conflicting rights and protect the vulnerable.

But there was a rumble in the debate which was not happy.

The Humanists UK accused Christian lobbyists of 'hiding' their true motivations for opposing the Bill. Lewis Goodall wrote in the i Newspaper with a similar attack on Christian MPs for being 'dishonest' about their real reasons for opposing the Bill, suggesting that they should declare their Christian faith. He notes that 'religious MPs’ opposition is rarely articulated in overtly theological terms' and that opposing assisted dying 'largely or principally on the basis of one’s own faith alone, in a modern cosmopolitan democracy such as our own, seems far from satisfactory'. The respect and ignore strategy.

There was a fascinating exchange on Radio 4's Sunday programme between Chine McDonald, Director of the Theos think-tank, and broadcaster Mark Mardell. Mardell makes a similar argument again, saying that opposing assisted dying 'for religious reasons' would amount to 'stuffing your beliefs down my throat' and that those holding such beliefs should be honest that the real reason for the opposition is not concern for coercion or a desire for better palliative care but the belief that life comes from God and only He can take it away.


It seems to Mouse that there has been a failure here to unpack what is meant by 'religious beliefs' and specifically a misunderstanding of the difference between ethics and theology.

Theology is principally concerned with understanding the nature of God, while ethics is principally concerned with how best to live in the world. Christian ethics naturally considers that question from the perspective of the Christian faith.

Even in the Church we have fallen foul of missing the distinction, sometimes intentionally. In our debates about sexuality we talk about ethical issues as if they are theological issues. We use language like 'teaching of the Church' to obscure the fact that the Church's ethical teaching is not the same type of doctrine as its theological teaching. Sometimes, this is intentional as questions of Christian ethics imply issues where different perspectives are possible and compromise is likely required. There are questions where human reason and experience come into play, rather than simply questions of Biblical interpretation. By contrast, if you can 'win' the argument with a killer exegesis on clear Biblical grounds, then compromise and perspective is out of the question. The question of how can a Christian best live in the world when it comes to sex is translated into a theological question of what the Bible says we can and cannot do with regards to sex.

Mouse suspects some of this comes from the inheritance of the protestant tradition where the questions being asked by the reformers were theological ones rather than ethical ones, primarily concerned with issues like the nature of salvation, whereas the Catholic tradition has had a greater emphasis on ethics. The tradition which trumpets sola sciptura is one which sets a firm foundation for its theology, but runs into difficulty with its ethics.

So it is no wonder that those outside the Church also miss the distinction.

When critics question the 'real' motives behind ethical objections to assisted dying, they are imagining a theological argument, along the lines articulated by Mark Mardell. A belief which relies on a matter of faith for it to hold water. If you don't believe that God is the giver of life, then the house of cards on which that argument is built falls apart. It also implies that other questions raised, such as concern for vulnerable people will be coerced or guilt-tripped into prematurely ending their lives for the convenience of uncaring relatives are seen as a smoke-screen behind which the real theological objection is hidden.

In truth, the view is an ethical one. The lessons we learn from the Christian tradition teach us how best to live with each other in the world. The message that we learn is that the world is a better place when we put in place legal measures to make sure that nobody can be coerced into ending their life and that mutuality and care for others in our community is better for us all than a society where everyone has to look after themselves. There is a theological foundation under that, but the view is also informed by reason, experience, an understanding of human nature and the human condition.

For this reason, there is a growing body of opinion who have argued that Christian ethics are of critical importance outside the Christian faith. Historian Tom Holland has persuasively argued that the secular ethics which the Church's strongest critics trumpet are, in fact, rooted in the Christian tradition from which they sprung. The secular humanism of the Humanists UK, which values personal freedom and respect for the individual are a product of the protestant reformation which insisted that each individual must make their own personal commitment to their faith. To this extent, the secular and Christian ethics at play in the debate on assisted dying are both expressions of the same philosophical tradition and it is quite wrong for one of those to suggest the other is illegitimate.

From a different perspective, the growth of 'cultural Christianity' has shown increasing numbers of people who embrace Christian ethics, recognising the benefits to society of organising itself along a strong ethical framework, while not necessarily accepting the theological beliefs from which it was derived. While some on the progressive side of the Church fear that these arguments flirt with Christian nationalism, there is a strong link with Tom Holland's perspective that the Western ethical and philosophical perspective is inherently bound with Christian ethics, but takes it further to suggest that this should not just be understood as the backdrop to our public debates, but actively championed as the organising principle for our polity.

When Mouse heard the criticisms from those arguing that religious lobbyists and MPs were 'hiding' their true reasons for opposing assisted dying, it struck Mouse that the reaction from the Church was rather confused. We weren't sure how to react to that. We certainly didn't want to deny that our faith informed out position and there was no suggestion that a Christian perspective should not be heard, but we were unable to pick apart the argument to articulate clearly that while there is a Christian foundation to our ethics, the principles being argued for stand on their own two feet whether you accept the Christian heritage from which they developed or not. The gut reaction was to assume that the old argument was being made that Christians should stick to singing hymns on Sundays and stay out of politics was being made, so some kicked back that Christians had and important point to make. While true, that is slightly off-target. The point we need to make is that Christian ethics has something important to say about how we live in community today regardless of whether you accept the theological tradition behind it. In other words, engage with the argument we're making, not the one you think we should be making.

If we're not able to re-claim this territory, then there is a real danger that anyone who holds to a religious faith will have everything they say labelled as a religious argument, to be pushed out of the public sphere and relegated into a matter only relevant to those who share those religious views. This would be a great shame not only for those within the Church who have so much to offer in ethical discussions, but also for everyone else who would unknowingly begin to divorce the ethical foundations of our society from their foundations.





28 November 2024



To assist all of you looking for a Christmas reading list or some gift ideas, The Church Mouse has compiled a handy list of books published (roughly) in the last year. Each one has come with glowing reviews and a personal recommendation via Bluesky or Twitter.

Mouse has linked to a certain online book retailer so you can easily find them, but other booksellers are available and Mouse encourages you to support your local bookshop if you can.

Women of The Nativity by Paula Gooder

Mouse is a big Paula Gooder fan. This book is the latest of her genre-defying imagined histories, where she tells the nativity story through the eyes of nine women. Mary, Elizabeth and others who are recorded in history have their perspective expanded and put into focus using Paula's deep biblical expertise.

Do Not Be Afraid by Rachel Mann

Subtitled 'The Joy of Waiting in a Time of Fear' Rachel writes The Archbishop of York's Advent Book 2024 on the most Advent theme - waiting. The blurb tells us that this book contains 'luminous meditations' structured to support personal reflection and prayer over the four weeks of advent.

The Challenge of Acts by Tom Wright

Tom Wright's eminence in New Testament scholarship needs no qualification. In an accessible book, Tom takes on the book of Acts in a holistic way, setting it in its historical context in both the Greco-Roman world and its Jewish context, as well as its context within the wider New Testament narrative.

Lower Than The Angels by Diarmaid MacCulloch

The venerable church historian addresses the topic of sex and the church. Given his starting point on the subject, many have made their mind up before parting the pages on this book, but Mouse will reserve judgement until he has read it. Given Professor MacCulloch's historical expertise it deserves serious reading.

I, Julian by Claire Gilbert

A fictionalised autobiography of Julian of Norwich, which sounds absolutely brilliant. Interest in Julian has ramped up in recent years, with a compelling personal story and a message that resonates to this day. This version of her story has received rave reviews.

Fully Alive by Elizabeth Oldfiend

Elizabeth Oldfield has become an important voice as a Christian public intellectual in recent years, leading the Theos think tank and hosting a fab podcast, Sacred. She has stood down from Theos to focus on other projects and this book distils many of the topics that come through her conversations on Sacred on how to live a rich and fulfilled life in our current turbulent times.

Tis Mercy All by Natalie Williams

Mouse has loved Natalie's previous books. Natalie has a practical and authentic voice, drawing on her own lived experience of porverty and he time as CEO of Jubliee+ charity. In this book she sets out how to live a live as a 'mercy-bringer' in the world. Sounds good to Mouse. 

Waking The Women by Jayne Manfredi

Jayne is a social media legend and in this book she talks about one of the last taboos in church, 'the dreaded m-word: menopause'. The book blurb says that she writes with 'refreshing frankness' (not a surprise, Jayne!) and this book has had glowing reviews, described as moving, hilarious, profoundly spiritual and much more.

Jesus and Justice by Red Letter Christians UK

25 authors share stories and insights on seeking Jesus and justice. Some contributors are well-known and others' stories have not been widely told. Mouse expects an encouraging and inspirational read.

The Lord of Psalm 23 by David Gibson

Mouse loves to find new perspectives on familiar Bible passages. Psalm 23 is one of the most well known and well loved passages in all scripture. This book draws out theological insights and reflection on God's provision for us in our lives.

Bleeding for Jesus by Andrew Graystone

Mouse is expecting a difficult read in this one, but it is something we must face, however uncomfortable it may be. This account of John Smyth's abuse draws on many victim's accounts and Andrew Graystone's extensive research. Andrew has been a champion for Smyth's victims for years and after all we have learned from the shocking Makin report, we must listen them through Andrew's account.

Sign-up for content direct to your inbox

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

Essential privacy notice

The Church Mouse pays homage to the gods of data privacy and GDPR and will never give your email address to anyone else or use it for any purpose other than sending you the latest posts from this website or replying to your messages.